| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
105
   |
Posted - 2012.12.15 06:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
Sixx Spades wrote:
And yet, just because someone complains, it doesn't mean it was a legitimate issue. At every turn where something was either nerfed of buffed, the perpetrators had to take more and more extreme measures to adapt to the situation. Where is the end leading to? Where is the breaking point where a change is implemented where a certain activity is completely wiped out so that a segment of the population is completely protected, simply because they couldn't be asked to fit their ships and use their brains defensively?
We can just hope it never happen.
I came to realise it will never change. It's like fighting an uphill battle barefoot in the snow. If for example barges/exhumers were given extra low slots right now so people could keep thier current **** fit and add lets say a DC II to it. they would instead ask CCP to give the damn thing more CPU so they can fit one more MLU II. Removing MLUs from the game entirely and adding the "lost" yield back as ship bonus for example would still lead people to say CCP nerfed thier ship because they can't fit MLUs anymore. |
Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
108
|
Posted - 2012.12.15 16:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:yeah cause we all know Goons dont have an agenda
the Goon is strong in this thread lol I should probably start attending our weekly agenda meetings so I to know as much as you. Yeah, I mean, you've been out of the loop ...
I wonder when someone will start a rumor about you guys having a NKVD like arm in the corp to watch over the level of endoctrinement of all members. It's bound to happen right? |
Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
108
|
Posted - 2012.12.15 17:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote:I should probably start attending our weekly agenda meetings so I to know as much as you. Yeah, I mean, you've been out of the loop ... I wonder when someone will start a rumor about you guys having a NKVD like arm in the corp to watch over the level of endoctrinement of all members. It's bound to happen right? You haven't heard of it? They're terrifying, catching the subversives and spais.
Whats the point of spais? There is publicity over pretty much everything you do. Well the content creation at least. |
Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
109
|
Posted - 2012.12.15 23:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Gillia Winddancer wrote:
Interesting quote from Greyscale.
Too bad it is anything but true because there are several mechanics which does exactly the opposite of what he wants to see. He talks about organizational weaknesses, players should never feel safe whilst being in space etc etc, yet null-sec in it's current form does EXACTLY that.
I guess that quote about suicide ganking is also untrue then as well right?
We shall truct the high-sec publords over the devs. That way we will understand the game. How could the devs even pretend to know better? |
Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
109
|
Posted - 2012.12.16 00:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:La Nariz wrote:Gillia Winddancer wrote:
Well then oh wise one. Do tell me what weaknesses can be exploited if you face the biggest alliances? Anything that can cause serious economic damage over time.
Anything apart from having a huge blob fleet of your own that takes out PoS's that is.
Send us all of the bittcoins and we might be too distracted to do anything else. Why are you telling them to bribe us with shinies? Oh, shiny...
Me and one of my friend use to say we had ADOS. Attention Deficit Oh Shiny! |
Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
110
|
Posted - 2012.12.16 01:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:La Nariz wrote:Gillia Winddancer wrote:
Well then oh wise one. Do tell me what weaknesses can be exploited if you face the biggest alliances? Anything that can cause serious economic damage over time.
Anything apart from having a huge blob fleet of your own that takes out PoS's that is.
Send us all of the bittcoins and we might be too distracted to do anything else. Why are you telling them to bribe us with shinies? Oh, shiny... Me and one of my friend use to say we had ADOS. Attention Deficit Oh Shiny! Our weakness, it was discovered.
They can't possibly send enough to really distract all of you for a long time. |
Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
110
|
Posted - 2012.12.16 02:54:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:sYnc Vir wrote:Null sec folks say that highsec players get too much money for too little risk. They point out that they live in the most dangerous space in eve and should therefore be rewarded far greater then high sec players.
This is in fact totally bullsh!t. Null sec isn't even the second most dangerous space in eve. The list goes, Losec > Wormhole > Null > Empire.? An area of space is as safe as the players make it. Highsec cannot factor in to this because it is made safer by CCP through various mechanics with no input by the players.
Well technically if they tried to work together, high sec could create an intel channel but most of them are just worried about thier own small things insetad of the benefit of everyone so they stay silent as long as nothing ahppens to them. Setting a public watch list would be something they could do but it really won't happen. It's all "ME ME ME" and no "US" so they never help each other and would rather have thier own private belt to mine and such. |
Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
111
|
Posted - 2012.12.16 03:31:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:After 27 pages how could they POSSIBLY care anymore?!?!?!? 
Internet spaceship is SRS FKN BZNSS!!!! |
Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
111
|
Posted - 2012.12.16 04:59:00 -
[9] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Harland White wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:sYnc Vir wrote:Null sec folks say that highsec players get too much money for too little risk. They point out that they live in the most dangerous space in eve and should therefore be rewarded far greater then high sec players.
This is in fact totally bullsh!t. Null sec isn't even the second most dangerous space in eve. The list goes, Losec > Wormhole > Null > Empire.? An area of space is as safe as the players make it. Highsec cannot factor in to this because it is made safer by CCP through various mechanics with no input by the players. Yep. Get over it. Not changing. No, wait ! We still need to buff CONCORD more, or freighters... something, anything to reduce ganking !
Watch out or they will reduce teh alpha of every single weapon in the game by 40% thus not changing the firepower balance of anything but severely breaking the tanking side of most ship making them space maus.
I probably should not of posted that... |
Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
111
|
Posted - 2012.12.16 05:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Harland White wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:sYnc Vir wrote:Null sec folks say that highsec players get too much money for too little risk. They point out that they live in the most dangerous space in eve and should therefore be rewarded far greater then high sec players.
This is in fact totally bullsh!t. Null sec isn't even the second most dangerous space in eve. The list goes, Losec > Wormhole > Null > Empire.? An area of space is as safe as the players make it. Highsec cannot factor in to this because it is made safer by CCP through various mechanics with no input by the players. Yep. Get over it. Not changing. No, wait ! We still need to buff CONCORD more, or freighters... something, anything to reduce ganking ! Freighters need slots so they can fit a ~tank~. (Not that we'd consider putting cargo expanders in the lows.)
Well if you look at the icon of a cargo expander, it does look like a tank. :D |
| |
|